Tag Archives: board-level issue

Five house rules for managing risky behavior

By James Lam, author of Enterprise Risk Management: From Incentives to Controls | Published: August 9, 2012
James Lam

If all organizations face the risk that their people will undertake reckless or unethical behavior, how should they protect themselves? James Lam says the best defenses come down to five house rules.

Also tagged , , |

State of risk management, data

By David Rogers, Global Risk, SAS | Published: January 2, 2012
Data for risk management - 2012

When you take a look back over 2011, what will be the the stand out memory? Will it be the struggles in Greece and the other Eurozone countries to restructure their debt? How about the new regulatory changes or the new regulatory bodies in the US? David Rogers, SAS, says that many of these old problems caused by one overriding issue – data. What will you be doing about data in 2012?

Also tagged , |

2012 risk management agenda

By Anders Langgaard, Business Advisor for Risk, Nordic Region, SAS | Published: December 29, 2011
2012 Risk Management Agenda

One place to get wiser about the current risk agenda is the RiskMinds Europe conference, held in Geneva. Anders Langgaard, Business Advisor for Risk, SAS, has gathered a few of the discussions – including a very interesting one on CCPs – for you to ponder as you make decisions about 2012.

Also tagged , |

Four reasons data needs a Board’s eye view

By David Rogers, Global Risk, SAS | Published: September 8, 2011
David Rogers

Financial institutions worldwide have begun to realize that data isn’t an operational issue reserved for the IT department; instead it should be considered an asset with fundamental strategic importance. Find out why data has risen to become a board-level issue.

Also tagged , |

Has risk management been sidelined?

By Rob Mitchell, Editorial Dir, Longitude Research | Published: June 5, 2011
Has RM Been Sidelined

An Economist Intelligence Unit survey found a renewed focus among financial services execs on growth and profitability, perhaps misplaced as many claim that risk management changes made since the crisis are inadequate to handle future volatility and complexity. Is this a slide backward?

Also tagged , |