SAS Corporate Responsibility
An enduring commitment to employees, environment and communities
The guiding principles that launched SAS in 1976 are still at its foundation. The company strives to be approachable, so customers recognize SAS as a reliable partner and not just a vendor. It is about being customer-driven, engaging with customers to find out what they want and helping to solve their problems. It requires swiftness and agility, to adapt to changing technology and global conditions. It relies on the kind of innovation that grows in a workplace culture where employees feel valued, vested and inspired. And it demands that SAS be trustworthy, an ethical business partner that customers can count on for their critical decision-making processes.
Overarching these guiding principles is the commitment to sustainably drive operational efficiency, spawn innovation, and satisfy the expectations of customers, employees and society. This commitment and understanding are driven from the top. Through the SAS Executive Sustainability Council, top executives ensure that sustainability goals and priorities permeate every aspect of the company's operations. Externally, SAS senior management is represented on the boards of leading conservation organizations, such as The Nature Conservancy, and provides influence on the global stage through organizations such as the World Economic Forum, World Resources Institute and the Environmental Defense Fund.
This Corporate Responsibility site reflects the core values and achievements of how SAS does business as an employer, a software provider and a corporate citizen. Within this site, you can learn more about the four critical categories of corporate responsibility: Governance and Management, Education Philanthropy, Employees and Environment. This information is at the core of how we operate our business. In addition, with our 2010 CSR report, you have access to the updated metrics, initiatives and 2011 goals for each of these areas.

From the CEO
Since SAS began in 1976, corporate social responsibility has been fundamental to the company's mission. In fact, the company was founded to extend the benefits of academic discovery to the world – to help drive better decisions and performance in health care, government, business and industry.
At SAS, corporate social responsibility is more than being "green" or being a good neighbor and employer. It is about corporate conscience in the larger sense, performance on the world stage, and creating a culture that truly values – and provides enduring value to – customers, employees and communities.
Granted, SAS is in a unique position to carry out this mission. Although 2009 was a tough year for many, the economic downturn only accentuated the need to do more with less – and stimulated demand for the kind of analytics-driven business intelligence that SAS delivers. We fared well.
While other companies were forced to let go of talent to cut costs, SAS actually added staff in high-priority areas and emerging markets. While average turnover rate in the software industry was 22 percent, at SAS it fell to 2 percent in 2009. (Forty percent of SAS employees have been with the company 10 years or more.) Privately held SAS achieved record global revenue of U.S.$2.31 billion, up 2.2 percent from 2008 – and reinvested 23 percent of it into R&D.
This strong financial position made it possible for SAS to make significant investments in employees, education and the environment – in initiatives that are already showing positive returns. For instance, in 2009, SAS:
- Continued offering its extraordinary range of employee benefits, including free on-site health care, which save an estimated $105 million annually.
- Generated 1.7 million kWh of sustainable energy – enough to power 150 average-sized North Carolina homes – from a five-acre solar farm, returning the energy to the local utility grid.
- Developed additional solar installations, including a major expansion of the solar farm to ultimately generate 3.7 million kilowatt-hours annually – enough to reduce CO2 emissions from conventionally produced electricity by more than 3,500 tons a year.
- Continued construction of a 280,000 square foot Executive Briefing Center and 38,000 square-foot cloud computing center designed to high-level LEED standards.
- Saved more than 19 million gallons of water through wise landscaping practices, low-flow water fixtures and employee awareness.
As a software company, SAS' environmental impact is low to begin with. The IT sector represents only about 2 percent of the world's carbon emissions. But we are in a unique position to support the sustainability efforts of other industrial and services sectors – those that account for the remaining 98 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2009, SAS delivered two significant new components for the SAS® for Sustainability Management suite, the analytic software solution that helps organizations measure and manage their environmental impact: SAS Sustainability Reporting and SAS Energy and Emissions Management.
This 2009 Corporate Social Responsibility Report presents many of the ways SAS puts action to its social ideals – and how these initiatives themselves are proving to be self-sustaining for the long term.
Sincerely,
Chief Executive Officer, SAS
About This Report
The 2009 SAS Corporate Social Responsibility Report was developed using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) sustainability reporting guidelines and is based on the calendar year. The report is self-declared at application level C – and subsequently qualified by the GRI at application level C.
Just as with our 2008 report, content was defined by a cross-divisional team of employees who have responsibility for key business areas, including corporate services, human resources, internal communications, external communications and marketing.
For the 2009 reporting period, the team used SAS for Sustainability Management to provide the facts and figures regarding our environmental footprint. This software solution has been adopted by SAS Corporate Services for environmental data management of SAS offices globally. Social and economic information was provided from the operational systems that support our global human resources and financial departments. The information has been thoroughly reviewed by executive leadership and other internal stakeholders.
In keeping with environmentally sustainable practices, we chose not to provide a full printed report, only a short synopsis. The report is available to all external stakeholder groups, including partners, analysts, customers and media via this dedicated section on the SAS external web site.
The 2009 SAS Corporate Social Responsibility Report includes information for SAS Institute Inc., the US-based parent company for SAS, as well as its global divisions, affiliates, and wholly owned subsidiaries. These business units include, among others, DataFlux, JMP, Teragram and IDeaS.
Many international offices have been corporate leaders in piloting new technologies, building practices, and employee engagement. Each year, our Executive Sustainability Council will evaluate strategies for expanding the scope of our corporate social responsibility reporting.
SAS welcomes your comments and questions regarding this report and our corporate responsibility efforts. For questions about this report or its contents, please e-mail globalreporting@sas.com.
2009 Highlights
Summary of strategic initiatives
SAS has grouped the contents of this report into five key categories. Click on each category below to see full details.
Highlights – Global SAS-owned offices
SAS has operations in 54 countries around the world. To see a full list of SAS regional offices, visit www.sas.com/offices.
Fourteen global locations, comprising 64 buildings, are housed in SAS-owned facilities, so there is limited opportunity to control such factors as electricity sourcing, HVAC efficiency and building management practices. Some areas have no municipal recycling options. Others have unusual climate or public service constraints. However, SAS global offices each engage in corporate social responsibility activities to varying degrees, to the extent feasible. The list below shows some examples of 2009 initiatives. In 2010, we intend to expand the boundaries of our reporting and include more countries' initiatives.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Index
| Indicator | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy and Analysis | ||
| 1.1 | Statement from the most senior decision maker of the organization | From the CEO |
| Organizational Profile | ||
| 2.1 | Name of the organization | Legal Form |
| 2.2 | Primary brands, products and services | Products, Services and Markets |
| 2.3 | Operational structure | Governance Structure |
| 2.4 | Location of headquarters | Legal Form |
| 2.5 | Number of countries where organization operates | Legal Form |
| 2.6 | Nature of ownership and legal form | Legal Form |
| 2.7 | Markets served | Products, Services and Markets |
| 2.8 | Scale of organization | Corporate Performance and Value |
| 2.9 | Significant changes during reporting period | About This Report |
| 2.10 | Awards received during reporting period | Awards and Recognition in 2009 |
| Report Parameters | ||
| Report Profile | ||
| 3.1 | Reporting period | About This Report |
| 3.2 | Date of most recent previous report | About This Report |
| 3.3 | Reporting cycle | About This Report |
| 3.4 | Contact person | About This Report |
| Report Scope and Boundary | ||
| 3.5 | Process for defining content | About This Report |
| 3.6 | Boundary of the report | About This Report |
| 3.7 | Limitations on scope or boundary | About This Report |
| 3.8 | Basis for reporting on entities that can significantly affect comparability | About This Report |
| 3.9 | Data measurement techniques and bases of calculations | About This Report |
| 3.10 | Re-statements of information provided in earlier reports | Not relevant |
| 3.11 | Significant changes from previous reporting periods | About This Report |
| GRI Content Index | ||
| 3.12 | Standard disclosure tables | GRI Index |
| Governance, Commitments and Engagement | ||
| Governance | ||
| 4.1 | Governance structure | Governance Structure |
| 4.2 | Executive officer | Governance Structure |
| 4.3 | Unitary board structure | Governance Structure |
| 4.4 | Mechanisms for employees to provide recommendations to the governance body | Governance Structure |
| 4.9 | Procedures of the highest governance body for overseeing the organization's identification and management of economic, environmental, and social performance | Governance Structure |
| Engagement | ||
| 4.14 | Stakeholder groups | Stakeholder Engagement |
| 4.15 | Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage | Stakeholder Engagement |
| Economic Performance Indicators | ||
| Economic Performance | ||
| EC1 | Direct economic value generated and distributed | Financial Strength |
| Environmental and Performance Indicators | ||
| Energy | ||
| EN3 | Direct energy consumption by primary energy source | Energy Conservation |
| EN4 | Indirect energy consumption by primary source | Energy Conservation |
| EN5 | Energy saved due to conservation and efficiency improvements | Energy Conservation |
| EN6 | Initiatives to provide energy-efficient or renewable energy-based products and services | Energy Management – 2009 Key Initiatives |
| EN7 | Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and reductions achieved | Energy Management – 2009 Key Initiatives |
| Water | ||
| EN8 | Total water withdrawal by source | Water Conservation |
| EN10 | Percentage and volume of water recycled and reused | Water Conservation |
| Biodiversity | ||
| EN11 | Land owned, leased, managed in or adjacent to protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value | Protecting Biodiversity and Habitats |
| EN13 | Habitats protected or restored | Protecting Biodiversity and Habitats |
| EN15 | Protected species in areas affected by operations | Protecting Biodiversity and Habitats |
| Emissions, Effluents and Waste | ||
| EN16 | Total direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions by weight | Energy Conservation |
| EN18 | Initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reductions achieved | Energy Management – 2009 Key Initiatives |
| EN22 | Total weight of waste by type and disposal method | Waste Reduction and Recycling |
| EN23 | Total number and volume of significant spills | Reducing Effluents and Waste |
| Products and Services | ||
| EN26 | Initiatives to mitigate environmental impacts of products and services | Energy Management – 2009 Key Initiatives |
| Compliance | ||
| EN28 | Fines and sanctions for noncompliance with environmental laws and regulations | Environmental Compliance |
| Labor Practices and Decent Work Performance Indicators | ||
| Employment | ||
| LA1 | Workforce by employee type, employee contract and region | Number of Employees |
| LA2 | Number and rate of employee turnover by age group, gender and region | Employee Retention |
| LA3 | Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees | Employee Benefits |
| Occupational Health and Safety | ||
| LA7 | Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days and absenteeism, work-related fatalities by region | Occupational Health and Safety |
| LA8 | Education, training, counseling, prevention and risk-control programs regarding serious diseases | Occupational Health and Safety |
| Employee Retirement | ||
| LA11 | Programs for skills management | Occupational Health and Safety |
| Society Performance Indicators | ||
| Corruption | ||
| SO3 | Percentage of employees trained in the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures | Staff Ethics and Compliance Training |
| SO4 | Actions taken for incidents of corruption | Staff Ethics and Compliance Training |
| Public Policy | ||
| SO5 | Public policy positions and participation in public policy development and lobbying | Public Policy |
| SO8 | Fines or sanctions for non-compliance with laws | Public Policy |


