Know Your Blind Spots in Tax Fraud Prevention

The lead manager stole small amounts at first. Then, after testing and learning the thresholds that would raise red flags, the manager became progressively bolder and siphoned off larger amounts in the names of fake businesses “owned” by friends and relatives. 

When someone noticed that the average amount of transactions was trending upward, it was attributed to market conditions during the real estate boom and was not researched further. Over the course of 15 years, the manager’s activities went undetected, and they were able to steal $50 million.

Here’s the kicker – this manager worked for a tax agency, the very type of organization you would think would be most vigilant about fraud prevention.

Internal fraud detection

Most tax agencies focus on ensuring that their external fraud prevention efforts are robust. But they may be overlooking other types of fraud going on right under their noses – theft from the inside.

In this property tax refund case, appropriate oversight and custody controls were so poor that the external auditors couldn’t see the pattern. In 15 years, the agency never discovered it. The fraud was eventually exposed by a bank employee who sensed something fishy about a refund check presented for deposit.

Unfortunately, this employee’s supervisors were all fired because this extensive theft happened on their watch. They hadn’t established the proper fraud prevention controls and reporting to thwart the theft, or even to recognize it was happening. They didn’t know what they didn’t know – and their jobs were collateral damage. These were executives who had been with the agency for 20 years.

After that incident, the agency put more controls on its tax system to prevent this type of fraud. However, several years later, a different employee in the tax enforcement division did a similar thing with individual income tax refunds to the tune of $500,000. In this case, automated reporting provided clues to impropriety, and a sharp-eyed CPA delved into it.

Why did these fraud campaigns go on for so long before anyone noticed? And even more importantly, what must be done to stop it from happening again?

These cases point to the three biggest blind spots tax agencies face in fraud prevention and detection: firefighting, weak reporting and thin analytics.

Firefighting

Firefighting refers to being so focused on the most obvious emergency that you fail to see the bigger picture. For example, don’t be so preoccupied with identity theft and taxpayer fraud that you don’t realize what employees are doing. Is anyone committing tax refund theft or helping friends and family trim their tax liabilities?

Weak reporting

You can’t get away with not knowing what you don’t know. Have reliable analytical and statistical reporting. Give investigators and other staff the ability to generate their own reports, act quickly on alerts, investigate deeply and explore the patterns they see.

The second fraudster described here was stopped much sooner – tens of millions of dollars sooner – thanks to additional reports and anomaly detection. A solid fraud analytics solution would have found it almost immediately.

Thin analytics

Integrated tax systems are great for automating tax return and refund processes and managing audit and collections cases – but even those with a “fraud module” have limited analytical capabilities. These systems usually take a narrow view, running a tax return against basic business rules that define what is customary or unusual. For example, rules might decree that total itemized deductions should not exceed a certain percentage of adjusted gross income.

Business rules can catch unsophisticated fraud, but they miss many issues that advanced mathematical techniques can detect. Fraudsters can easily circumvent basic detection techniques, and they’re sometimes assisted by employees with proprietary knowledge of the organization.

Advanced analytics for fraud detection

Using advanced analytics such as predictive modeling, anomaly detection and network analysis, you can find fraud indicators faster and put safeguards in place that deter fraudsters. For instance:

• Predictive modeling can identify suspicious returns based on the known filing patterns of proven fraudsters. For example, a fraudster might file refund returns for progressively higher amounts year over year, testing to find the threshold that triggers scrutiny. Predictive analytics can spot this stair-stepping pattern and score the likelihood of fraud.
• Anomaly detection will show you answers to questions such as, “Are this person’s itemized deductions out of line with others in the income peer group or geographic neighborhood?” Or “Does the monthly variation in gross sales make sense for this type of business?” Unlike business rules, which require you to know what you’re looking for, anomaly detection automatically establishes what normal looks like for a peer group – and then automatically flags anything that looks abnormal.
• Network analysis reveals relationships among taxpayers, tax returns, tax preparers, business activity, and corporate officers or other responsible parties. People may be linked by a common address, employer, family member, bank account or other factors. In the case of insider fraud, network analytics can also uncover relationships with an employee conducting theft or helping others to facilitate fraud.

Don’t be the one who didn’t know what you didn’t know

Top-notch reporting with fraud detection analytics isn’t just “nice to have” anymore. It’s a necessity. Millions of dollars, and even your job, might depend on it. Find out what’s really under the hood of your tax systems and supplement with additional analytics as needed.

Advanced analytics solutions for tax fraud detection are inexpensive relative to your core tax system, and they can be implemented quickly with both legacy software and modern systems. This imperative analytics layer coordinates with your existing systems to create an ecosystem that deters theft and protects revenue.