Using their best judgment
Arizona courts operate more efficiently with help from SAS®
Twenty days behind bars for first-time offenders sounds like a shrewd way to fight drunk driving, right? Well, maybe not. That's what the Arizona legislature learned from a study commissioned to examine the issue before it became law.
Turns out that not only would this mandatory sentence prove burdensome to local jails, but it would also pack local courtrooms with more defendants seeking jury trials, creating a judicial backlog as they requested continuances.
This study was just one instance of how the Court Services Division of the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) uses SAS pore over several years of arrest and court data to provide information to lawmakers on a variety of matters that affect taxpayers and the state's courts. As a result, local and state officials can make decisions that keep their courts – and budgets – operating efficiently.
"The challenge for us is that we collect a lot of information that we must organize and give back to the court community," says Humberto (Bert) Cisneros, a research and statistics specialist within the Court Services Division. "SAS is a great help to us because of its strength in analyzing data and the great job it does of reporting."
Providing information to the legislature
Cisneros, along with fellow specialist Mark McDermott and research assistant Heather Darling, collect about 3,000 reports each year that contain data on case filings activity as well as information about court revenue and expenditures. They summarize the reports for a variety of uses by a variety of audiences.
For example, county officials had asked the legislature to create additional superior court judicial positions, whose salaries would be paid by the counties that hired them, except for judgeships, which are elected positions that carry an annual salary of $120,750. "Bert and I used SAS to analyze the data, including population statistics we obtain from the Arizona Department of Economic Security, and show how many cases were currently being processed and whether another judicial position was justified," McDermott says. "They ended up creating new positions in four different counties, and four additional superior court judge positions came out of that data analysis."
Meanwhile, data analysis has revealed that one out of every 100 persons arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) has a second DUI charge pending. And of those, one-third have been convicted of drunk driving in the past.
Cisneros also used SAS to analyze approximately 32,000 DUI terminations in fiscal year 2004 in limited jurisdiction courts. The analysis showed that most justice and municipal courts on average adjudicate DUI charges within the 180 days allowed by administrative order. Resolving DUI cases more quickly is one of the year's top strategic agenda initiatives established by the newly appointed Arizona Chief Justice Ruth V. McGregor, adds Cisneros.
Affecting local, state budgets
The Court Services group also uses SAS to analyze how much money courts are actually collecting in relation to fines and penalties they are assessing. If a court is only collecting 40 cents out of every dollar it assesses, the state needs to know why. Arizona's geography can lead to some tricky situations. For instance, many offenders reside in neighboring Mexico, making it virtually impossible to collect fines from them. In addition, the counties that border neighboring states also have a difficult time collecting from traffic offenders who reside across the state line.
SAS runs 'behind the screens'
Since so many of the reports come in on paper, they have to be entered electronically and updated on screens that mimic the actual forms. And much of it has to be validated before it's entered. "Once we clean it up, then we use SAS to report on it," Cisneros says. "SAS is a vital part of how we communicate what's happening in our courts, because we use it to generate 700 pages of statistical reports every fiscal year."
These days, those reports are made available on the Web so that most ad hoc requests are now self-service. "That's cut down on the need for at least half a position," Cisneros says. "It cuts down on a lot of our work, which is great because we have so many other things we need to focus on, such as studying the DUI judicial process in limited jurisdiction courts."
The results illustrated in this article are specific to the particular situations, business models, data input, and computing environments described herein. Each SAS customer’s experience is unique based on business and technical variables and all statements must be considered non-typical. Actual savings, results, and performance characteristics will vary depending on individual customer configurations and conditions. SAS does not guarantee or represent that every customer will achieve similar results. The only warranties for SAS products and services are those that are set forth in the express warranty statements in the written agreement for such products and services. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. Customers have shared their successes with SAS as part of an agreed-upon contractual exchange or project success summarization following a successful implementation of SAS software. Brand and product names are trademarks of their respective companies.
Copyright © SAS Institute Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Arizona Administrative Office of the Courts
Summarize thousands of reports and other data sources into the intelligence that keeps courts running smoothly
SAS provides quick reporting and reliable analyses for smart decision making
“ SAS is a vital part of how we communicate what's happening in our courts. ”
Research and Statistics Specialist, Arizona Administrative Office of the Courts