The Knowledge Exchange / Risk Management / How to tell a genuine tax error from tax fraud

How to tell a genuine tax error from tax fraud

HMRC uses analytics to focus resources on areas where the highest risk of error, fraud and criminal activity

While the constant talk about budget cuts might have the feel of a scratched record, we can’t escape the reality of today’s straitened economic circumstances. But there is something that tax and welfare agencies can do to lessen the impact. A bold statement perhaps, but nonetheless accurate.

With an increasing need to fund the welfare state in G20 countries, we know that cutting costs is no longer enough. Governments must protect their revenue streams. Tax avoidance and error costs 145 countries, representing over 98 percent of world GDP, more than US$3.1 trillion annually.

We’re already seeing a number of tax agencies getting a grip on this. How? By using data to help identify tax evaders and tell the difference between genuine error and criminal intent.

At its simplest level, let’s consider a taxpayer who declares an income of $40,000 a year. With the right technology and processes in place, it’s possible to match his tax return against data from other government agencies, credit reference agencies, or publicly available registries. These might provide us with lifestyle indicators suggesting that he possesses properties abroad and a high-spec car – way beyond the reach of a $40,000 salary.

This has become a reality in the UK where tax agency HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is among those already using analytics to get tax yield success.

Capgemini delivered HMRC’s award-winning strategic risking system “Connect”, which takes information from 30 different data sources, cross-matches one billion internal and third party data items, and uncovers hidden relationships across organisations, customers and their associated data links (bank interest, lifestyle indicators and stated tax liability). The solution, which includes data analysis and data mining products and tools from SAS, underpins HMRC’s ability to focus skilled resources on businesses, individuals and sectors that pose the highest risk of error, fraud and criminal activity.

The result? HMRC has already recovered over £1.4bn in additional tax yield. That’s surely an eye opener for other agencies seeking to deliver new capabilities that protect tax yield and reduce welfare benefit evasion.

For more information about reducing tax fraud and evasion and increasing tax revenue, read my blog or contact me directly with your questions.

Tags: , ,
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • email

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>